Love Story by Erich Segal - a critic of Pivotal Observations

The crux of Mr. Segal skills can be dug up with purpose and elegance in the first five lines of the novel. Is proving to be a man, if not deceitful, brilliance and a quiet dignity that often engulfed in a humiliating intellectuality with serenity and reflection. An amendment in their ulterior motives Avatar was a passionate love story for the debut of Harvard saliva Erich Segal, a radical phenomenon in its time of being adjusted to a loss of control of the tent Chart Buster, stillunwilling to remain soft, flexible head with nostalgia, charm and his solitary shell can enjoy the charm of a subversive Pep Love, defies social conventions and beyond, survived their prejudices. Notching itself a transcendent place, an "interlocked Mills & Boon 'and' Danielle Steele and multiplied or less controversial, in a league of its own, Love Story, however, has a strong, unwavering candidate, constantly welcoming favorite was" All Birds The Thorn "and" BridgesMadison County, but the pure, uncorrupt stability dramatic love story is intact, indisputably, invulnerable.

Love Story, is best made a full "house of mirrors and illusions." The characterization is bad, fantastic character development, the prose is flabby and often painful, but help to numeric peak flowering, the dialogues are unconventional, but at the same time, unconventional good, the highlight is actually an anti- climax is grotesquesad, poignant, and everything is applied intelligently damningly.

From the first sight of each other series, the mysteries of complex-made-concise and complexity of relationships, both platonic and the race for the final vote, unlike most fiction is suffering and lack genital classic pitfalls and setbacks plastic emotion conceited, over-the-top kitsch and a pungent odor of Schmaltz denies romance that the reader from the usualSatisfactions and said a little thread of love with an unspecified and apparently considerable realism, strong kind, the source book and incomparable ride.

E 'equipped with switchblade-sharp wits and sophisticated professionalism, Segal pens the story of a powerful, distinctive jock Oliver Barrett IV and monotonous, the mill mediocre running beauty Jennifer Radcliffe quibble. Oliver is the root elitist: Jenny is a girl of the working class, Oliver is theQuintessence Playboy: Jennifer is the quintessential romantic, Oliver tries to yoke his background flight: Jenny has tried to patch them wild end to all interventions, even love and affection seems to occupy the first part of illusions, where the reader believes in the strength of the bond, regardless of injuries, is forced to be the only option was "love conquers all" likely.
The second illusion is that of mild Understandablethe basis of the association. Throughout the novel, short story or if you prefer, the theme of the dialogue was to establish a kingdom of informality and a new and complete loss of inhibition between the spouses. This further corresponds to the aesthetic nature of the relationship and attitude, making it an independent rather than birds, and decided instead squalid and application. As Rushdie explained: "What is freedom of expression can not be defined without the '?freedom to insult. "The international courses are so rare a breed, aged well, and considered this unusual sense of maturity that the reader through the simplicity and the foundation is what is the connection, flattened. The use of motor expression, defamation pushing lexicon as "bitch" to a woman and a man facing a similar verdict is connotative of the closure of a logical sense to all the love that the common policy of futility receptive makes things smaller, and insignificantirrelevant.

The illusion of the third and final trial. The teaching method in effect, a mutiny, mutiny, they are indispensable in the leaves of interdependence more important than ever, and relays to the reader that the lovers are united in a segregation as outcasts from society, for the defeat that led to the social norms and in vain, and there is a reader realize unconsciously, happiness besieged by the threat of pathos. Barret Oliver and Jenny quibble wedagainst the opposition and warning of the father of Oliver, repressed or exiled from his fortune to live a low, impoverished childhood life of their marriage, avoid the stock conventions of marriage and marriage customs with a method of approach is not other than the sanctity of chastity and virtue of this alliance.

Segal composed this at the height of his abilities, in the heyday of his narrative and the height of the scope of his imagination, a series of compulsiveBestsellers from Erich Segal, Love Story, in the past, as the inimitable "Doctors," "Oliver's Story ',' acts of faith," made "men, women and" children, etc., but no one was able to appeal and good looks in addition to the novel free fireworks literary, a story that explains nothing, that the most arrant under his nickname.

The essence of the love story can perhaps also credited its brevity. Read more novels languish unnecessarily clumsy clumsy crawl along the edgesPrissy, coarse and contemptible unrealistic fiction with the tedium and boredom, "said Segal is known in softer, sweeter, almost in a whisper, the cult with respect and reverence, the square roots of shame and ingenuity Callow. Segal recklessly undermined his readers the pleasure of a Herculean narrative (an arena in which he demonstrated his skills as the huge seven hundred pager "Doctors"), in favor of frivolous test flippantness and transferred to greenYoung love, problems, dilemmas, dilemmas and sublime moments of happiness and surprise surprise disturbing that delight, inspire and most agile minds inclined to run out.

Love Story is to look up to date and so far unparalleled courting, the dreams sycophantically young virgin wandering in the valleys of love stormy recalls trademark of the foundations of a past generation there is a famous writing of a kind of glorious non-religious deity that men do notFlight, and women are not able to handle, and the world can not help but let flourish.

0 ความคิดเห็น: